Thu 2 Mar 2006
Rumors that engineering mules of the 2009 Mustang have been testing in Arizona have recently surfaced in more than one place. Aimed to hit the market just in time for the 45th anniversary, the new 2009 Mustang has a major challenge ahead with coming competition from GM and Chrysler. The Dodge Challenger has been given the go-ahead and Camaro is a car that GM just has to build. Ford is working on a new Mustang that is planned to meet that challenge, but there are many hurdles in that. They are budget poor and as history has always shown the Mustang has had few friends in the bean counter department. So a complete ground-up re-design is out. Instead we will see a sweet evolution of the Mustang we have today, but a one that should address the weak points of today’s car and then some.
So what is the 2009 Mustang going to be? More retro? More power? A true coupe? The following words represent our best soothsaying predictions based on market knowledge, our product strategy experience, educated guessing and a little bit of rumor.
2009 Mustang Body and Exterior:
The 2005 Mustang was openly accepted by the Mustang faithful because of its heritage design , but many die-hard Ford Mustang fans often critique the current car as being a little plain and lacking excitement. Ford reads the web forums, the magazines and the tea leaves. The 2009 Mustang will be more daring and bold in its styling. We don’t look for the wheelbase and overall dimensions to change much. However more pronounced front and rear flanks combined with a proportionally smaller glass area is sure to make the 2009 Mustang look more “buff“. Retro throwback cues will continue to rule the theme of the car, but 21st century details are going to come back into the mix like projector beam headlights for example. Many Mustang pundits say the car will follow history and evolve toward a ‘69-70 Mustang look. Marketing gurus say the ‘70s are BIG with our Generation Y buyers. That is who the next Mustang needs to hook in. The 2009 Mustang will be more muscular and bolder in form and is indeed likely to take styling DNA from ‘69 to 70’s models. It will have sharper and pronounced lines that are perhaps more modern however. Up front we certainly see a more contemporary facial expression with menacing eyes. One needs only to see the Camaro and Challenger concepts from the 2006 Detroit Auto Show to see where this could be headed. Further, the notion that a full-blown notchback coupe is coming is not all that far off. The current convertible Mustang shows that the envelope can work from both a styling and packaging standpoint.
Familiar engines like the 4-valve supercharged DOHC modulars and the 3-valve 4.6 will be back for 2009. New fuel saving displacement-on-demand (DOD) technology will be new however.
2009 Mustang Engine and Drive-train:
Evolution. The new 3-valve 4.6 liter V8 will likely soldier on as the standard 2009 Mustang GT power plant. It has already proven to be a winner both on the track and on the street. What is sure to be new for Mustang is displacement-on-demand (DOD) technology that will shut down 4 of the 8 cylinders while coasting or cruising at speed. When you step on the gas, the computer will provide seamless power delivery when the full cylinder count comes back on line. Because of the added efficiency afforded by DOD, a more aggressive tune will be feasible offering up to perhaps 325-340 hp. The 4-valve version of the 4.6 and 5.4 are also likely to return in either supercharged or naturally aspirated forms for higher performance models. A 3-valve 5.4 liter V8 is also a possibility as it is less costly than a supercharged engine with similar power.
For the base power plant in the 2009 Mustang we believe the new 3.5 liter DOHC V6 built in Ohio should replace the decades-old German built 4.0 liter truck engine that the current car uses. The new 24-valve power plant offers more standard power at around 250-260 and is a far more refined and happy revving engine for the Mustang.
Will a six speed transmission ever become standard in the 2009 Mustang? Perhaps, but it is more likely to be a six-speed automatic that is available at first. Unless the competition warrants otherwise, our bet is on the 5-speed manual to stick around except on hi performance models like the Cobra. A true manu-matic sequential gearbox with shift paddles on the wheel is an expensive proposition that might be in the cards for the upper line Cobras, but we aren’t holding our breath.
2009 Mustang Chassis:
The “DEW-lite” chassis the 2005+ Mustang rides on was a significant investment for Ford even though it was derived from the existing floor pan that carried the Lincoln LS, Thunderbird, and Jaguar S-Type. Significant changes had to be made to lighten up both the weight and cost to fit within the Mustang’s needs. We see an evolution of the current chassis to continue under the new Mustang but with a few key changes. An independent rear suspension (IRS) was initially planned for the 2005 Mustang but notably missing when it arrived on the showroom floors. Why? It costs too much. While Ford has said that customers “don’t want it”, and that “it is not necessary, blah, blah”, they are well aware that the competition from GM and Chrysler are going to have it. They are aware that customers want it and that it’s a necessity to win over import buyers that would otherwise shop for a Nissan 350Z or other comparable sports cars. Thus, the next Mustang will have IRS if it is to be taken seriously among its peers both stateside and from abroad.
Left: Will Ford implement their new IRS design from the SUV lines? Right: The “My-Color” instrument panel is not coming back for a second show.
2009 Mustang Interior:
While it has earned high marks in fit and finish, design quality, and overall execution the 2005 Mustang’s interior has been much maligned for its cheap feeling hard plastics. We look for both visual and tactile improvements in the surfaces that the driver touches and has in their immediate sightlines. A new steering wheel, instrument cluster and door panels should take on a bolder more deeply sculpted theme to compliment the new exterior lines. Bolder, less retro touches with a simpler more “fun” feel will be implemented to help the 2009 Mustang appeal to a younger audience. Think of the interior in the BMW Mini Cooper S. The “My-Color” instruments will likely see the trash heap as it was a costly and unnecessary feature that in the end was more trouble for Ford than it was worth.
Summary:
Our impression at this point is that Ford will continue to develop the Mustang in ways that exceed their efforts throughout the 1980’s and 1990’s as the success of the car in the showroom has their attention. While a number of special edition Mustangs will be coming our way in the meantime such as the upcoming 2007/2008 Mach 1, the 2009 Mustang might just be the one to wait for.
Story by Sam Haymart
Del.icio.us !
Digg it!
Blogmarks it!
Scoop it!
Fuzz it!
Stumble it!







April 24th, 2006 at 7:50 pm
I’m pretty sure that car enthusiast will wait for these 2009 Ford Mustang Concept. I bet, Mustang lovers, will be delighted and excited to see these out in the streets and highways.
Auto Parts for American Car Lovers also had an article on 2009 Ford Mustang Concept.
May 23rd, 2006 at 2:13 pm
Great job guys… Thank for you work…
June 7th, 2006 at 12:44 pm
Looking forward to the new generation Mustang’. Having owned a 69 Mach I that I regret getting rid of because of the spouse, I now at my age and being a bit better off than in my 20’s, I wish to own another with all the high tech features. Almost bought the latest generation Mustang, however I felt it was a bit to small in the back seat, my 69 was larger, and tight as it was I was able to carry a couple of passengers. Feel that the next generation should grow by about 4″-6″ to solve this problem. Will seriously look at the Dodge ‘Challenger’ and the Mustang soon, but the design and back seat size may be the determining factor.
July 14th, 2006 at 11:02 am
I have been waiting on the 2007 Mustang Shelby GT500, but now I have seen the new 2009 concept, I may just wait. But please don’t disappoint me, and change the design, I will be 62 years old then and I will need my dream car. Please do not limit the car by limiting the color patterns or the wheel size 18-20 x 7.75-9″ deep. Wide track the car.
August 17th, 2006 at 10:45 pm
Don’t let the legendary Mustang down, make it more powerful than either the Camaro or the Challenger.
In 2009 I’ll be 19 and I am looking forward on getting a Mustang as my first car. PLEASE make it worth it!!!!!!!!!!
September 10th, 2006 at 8:52 pm
The “New” mustang for 2009 should ha
September 10th, 2006 at 8:58 pm
The new Mustang for 2009 Should have a more powerful powerplant. Instead of the 4.6 they should drop in a 302 as standard in V8 models and a 351 optional. They should have the base model available with optional V8 powerplants instead of having to get a V8 by buying a GT.
A actual Coupe, Sportsroofand Convertable should be the bodystyles avalable.
November 3rd, 2006 at 6:48 am
Listen guys, according to me, the new ponycar shoulda not follow usual “muscle” def in this century. a 4.6V8 is already enough, more displacement’s gonna mean heavy nose car (no good),but ford guys just have to make it more powerful instead of gettin “just” 300+hp from it. then a IRS is gonna be great at all wheels why not a “state of the art” one, a 6 speed tranny for shorter 3rd an 4th gear, the car shoulda weight less (oh yes), get a better Weight distribution, ….
You may ask why
I think the goal is not only overtaking all those new upcoming muscles, no, but just kicka** all those imports they call a car, not only in 1/4 a mile but in every meaning of RACING (circuit, touge, drift, ….)
Am I asking for too much?
January 4th, 2007 at 5:28 pm
hey will its brent in ure class waz upp mustang is a nice car but they are all very similar i know they are all the same type of car and should look alike but they should not look as alike as they do and seeing the 2009 mustang pic at the top of the page encourages my thought of that later will.
January 6th, 2007 at 1:43 am
this is just a rip off of the new camaro. it looks just like it. but with a poor motor. The new camaro will spank the new mustang if they dont change.
January 22nd, 2007 at 8:18 pm
yeh im worried about nose heavy cars to but theres no replacement for displacement
February 22nd, 2007 at 8:47 pm
I own a 2001 mineral grey Mustang Cobra, and out of the many cars that I have owned, this one has been a rare gem that still runs hard at 144K miles without any real troubles to speak of. While I still own a 90 accord, a 2005 s2000, and an 2005 x5, the Cobra is my favorite car.
Now for some complaints.
Where is the variable valve timing on the heads? Almost every other manufacturer has implemented this form of “free” horsepower except Ford. Kill the Super Charger already.
Why does the new Mustang weight so much. Its not a sporty car when it weights over 3500 lbs.
Why does the new mustang look like those boring old mustangs from the 60’s and 70’s that couldn’t handle turns? Really its ugly, and so is that granddaddy interior. UGLY!!! And that e-brake, ahh!
The Italian concept mustang had the gayest, catch me … interior that I have EVER seen. Did I mention that it looked gay?
How the next mustang should be configured is simple. There should be no GT or Cobra, they should all be simple Rigid, lightweight (-3300lbs), RWD, with 4 wheel double wishbone suspension 6 speed 400 Hp 400 lbs torque mustangs, and the look should be simple, and aggressive. Once you get that right Ford, then you can start increasing your market share with stupid color changing dash lights, badge versions, and radio options.
Please don’t screw this up again Ford. You did a very good job with the Ford GT, do the same with the Mustang.
May 11th, 2007 at 6:20 am
I’m a proud owner of a 1964 Ford Mustang. One of the things that made this car popular from the begining was the several options avalible under the hood.
For example The base engine for the 1964 year model of the Mustang was a 200cid straight six, then came the 260cid V8(which was dropped in 65) afterward came the 289 2V, the the 289 4V, and finally came the Hi-po 289 with 271 horsepower. Not to shabby for those days.
Now I realize that there is a lot more to mustang that just whats under the hood, but the current line lacks powerplant options you can only choose between the 4.0 V6 or the 4.6 V8 and well there could be a better option rather than spending $50,000 on a new Shelby GT 500 just to get the performance lacked by the modular 4.6. Come on Ford you could at least put the 5.0 roller motor or the 5.4 as an option. Think on that…..
July 19th, 2007 at 4:20 pm
Hi. Im a big Mustang fan. This new version sounds nice but, would you please make it loose some weight. I would really love it if the Mustang GT would do 0-60 in 4.5 seconds without a Supercharger and 3.0 to 3.5 with one. That way i will have no need to buy a Camaro. Thank you.
December 31st, 2007 at 6:34 am
I too am looking for More Hourse power, Less weight, better milage, better handling and more style, although the S197 is light years ahead of the 4th Gen car it may need to pickup the pace if it wants to compete with the Camaro and Challenger or some of the imports coming to the market in 09.
March 4th, 2008 at 11:18 pm
I own a 2005 Mustang GT Premium package with leather interior. I bought it new off the lot about 3 years ago. I take prestine care of the car but I noticed today that the rear seats are different. The seat behind the passenger doesn’t have the ventilation holes on the top section that the other rear seat does and the front two seats. Is there are reason for this.